| Christianity and the Founding Fathers |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 April 2005 February 2005 January 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2003 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September My Links My essay: The Immorality of Marriage The Onion SelectSmart Games to test your logic, faith, morality, and philosophical ideas! Tom Robbins Quotes Funny Name Analysis Bushisms Letters From the Earth by Mark Twain Why I Am Not A Christian by Bertrand Russell Life, Liberty, Logic Wasting My Time RedTigress's Blog Jimmytherighteous's Blog Octo6er's Blog Nivek's Blog Magicjoejoe's Blog Littlemrmahatma's Blog Kurtmaddox's Blog Winstonsmith's Blog Drforbush's Blog Juniperflux's Blog Iron Blog Religion! tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog |
posted by: WinstonSmith (reply) post date: 02.17.04 (6:15 pm) Here here! I adhere to Ben Franklin's wise judgment. Of course, the Founding Fathers drafted the constitution with the idea to have a firewall -- a clear separation between Church & State to avoid persecution of people based upon the bigots, tyrants & hypocrites whom they had observed and despised. Today, we have our own bigots, tyrants & hypocrites in the so-called "religious rights" who want to take us back to the bad ole' days of the 14th century superstition and feudalism. Insanity. Shrub is too stupid with no comprehension of history, to understand that by pandering to the religious ideologues & demogogues he is simply creating a climate of more hatred, intolerance and in-fighting. Maybe his handlers understand this: DIVIDE & CONQUER while we working people scratch each other's eyes out in order to eke out a living-- THESE CORPORATE RAPISTS ARE LAUGHING AT US, AND LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK! posted by: WhyNot (reply) post date: 02.18.04 (2:44 am) Dragonbait22, thanks for this. It helps me understand a little bit about where the US come from. Only a pity that, as WinstonSmith points out, what looked like a healthy way of laying foundations seems to have engaged reversed gear instead of going foward. When I hear things like (only a few days ago) "we need to revive the values of good god-fearing americans" .... geee.... well, no need for a comment, right? The one heart-warming thing is to see so many Americans like you guys being aware of the insanity of it all. Indeed, when researching on the Internet, most of the sources of information about this stuff comes from your fellow-country folks. This is great for it means you guys are determined, have integrity, are not afraid of saying "this stinks" (even when "this"="US policies"). But to beat the monstrous ever-more sophisticaed brainwashing machine churning away and cretinizing the population at large is a real challenge. Oh, and don't get me wrong, I'm not in the least anti-american - hey, I'm married to one, and I wouldn't trade her for any French girl! I'm anti-anything that is corrupt and exploits ppl. Right now, thanks to Bush, one of the worst governments in the world is the American one, and because of the USA's impact on the whole planet's balance, the US government is my main preoccupation. I'm equally incensed about my own - regarding many issues. But most of these are domestic ones, which are not likely to mean much to you; also, I'm more concerned with world-wide issues. Still.... if you want to hear rants & rave about things in France that suck big time, I can fulfill your wildest dreams. posted by: DragonBait22 (reply) post date: 02.18.04 (5:37 pm) Reply to: WhyNot Well, the way I see it, there will likely always be those who insist upon forcing religion to be a part of the government. But there will also always be those of us who see the dangers in that and are not afraid to voice our opinions on the matter. ;) Still.... if you want to hear rants & rave about things in France that suck big time, I can fulfill your wildest dreams. Lol, I'll encourage you to do both- write about how you feel on American politics and also what's going on in France. At the very least, maybe I'll learn something. :) posted by: mblog (reply) post date: 02.18.04 (6:07 pm) Reply to: WhyNot While I agree with much of what you say, I disagree with your assessment of the American government. The US government is not George Bush. It is the US Constitution and a set of laws and several hundred years of history. It has some bad parts to it, but these shall pass. Bush is temporary, and although things can be slow at times, the abuses of Bush will be overturned. Bush is trying to push his "Christian" agenda, but when he tries to talk about constitutional amendments, he knows that the support is not there. While some religious Christians favor a constitutional ban on gays, they tend to change their minds when somebody explains how our constitution works. Our constitution defines the framework of our government and establishes our rights as citizens. It is not a lawbook that takes our rights away. Amendments have been made to grant more rights to the people. The only time our Constitution was amended to take rights away, it was followed by the only repeal of an amendment to the constitution. (prohibition of alcoholic beverages) So Bush can rant about whatever he wants, but ultimately, he will not do lasting harm to the US. Sooner or later we will have another president who recognizes that we are part of the rest of the world and must behave responsibly if we want people to trust us. posted by: mblog (reply) post date: 02.18.04 (6:25 pm) The Federalist Papers do mention Christianity explicitly. It is mentioned in Federalist No. 19. It does not say that we are a Christian nation or should be one. It discusses other nations throughout the world that were founded on such principles, and how they evolved. It talked about how nations held together until they were split apart by controversy. it ends by saying, "The controversies on the subject of religion, which in three instances have kindled violent and bloody contests, may be said, in fact, to have severed the league." This was in reference to the Swiss, who ended up having opposing alliances in different parts of the country because of this schism. I can't see how anybody could read this and think that they wanted a Christian nation. The Federalist papers had the goal of moving us from the articles of Confederation to our Constitution, and it's the end result that shows what they wanted. The fact that our constitution was ratified shows exactly what the founding fathers thought, and the fact that it was amended by them showed where they intended it to go. |
|