How religious beliefs have advanced


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 April
2005 February
2005 January
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December
2003 November
2003 October
2003 September

My Links
My essay: The Immorality of Marriage
The Onion
SelectSmart
Games to test your logic, faith, morality, and philosophical ideas!
Tom Robbins Quotes
Funny Name Analysis
Bushisms
Letters From the Earth by Mark Twain
Why I Am Not A Christian by Bertrand Russell
Life, Liberty, Logic
Wasting My Time
RedTigress's Blog
Jimmytherighteous's Blog
Octo6er's Blog
Nivek's Blog
Magicjoejoe's Blog
Littlemrmahatma's Blog
Kurtmaddox's Blog
Winstonsmith's Blog
Drforbush's Blog
Juniperflux's Blog
Iron Blog Religion!

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


How religious beliefs have advanced
02.15.04 (8:52 pm)   [edit]
Watching the Simspons a few minutes ago, I was once again reminded of the arrogance of religious beliefs. That is, those maintaining these beliefs hold them as better than the beliefs of others- others of different faiths and others of different times, as well.

While discussing the spirituality of Native Americans, Bart replied (paraphrasing): "Thank God we've come to our senses and now worship a carpenter who lived 2,000 years ago!" That sums it up perfectly, I think. To most, the beliefs and customs held by ancient groups seem absurd. Yet for some reason most are blind to the absurdities inherent in their own beliefs. Anyone who has studied Greek, Roman, or Norse mythology would likely agree that it would be quite silly to actually believe the myths to be factual. Considering an elite group of gods and goddesses who each ruled over a particular domain and interacted with mortals on occasion seems to modern man to be nothing more than a story, a myth. But somehow stories of a supreme being speaking the universe into existence and sending his son to earth to atone for the sins of mankind is considered realistic, and the book containing these stories is held to be historically accurate by some believers.

Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with assuming your beliefs are superior to the beliefs of others. In fact, I think it's impossible to actually have beliefs or veiws or an opinion without considering what you think is right to actually be better than the ideas of others. That only makes sense. But to claim that one myth is superior to another and to think that we have evolved in our religious beliefs is humurous to me. I can only imagine groups of students studying the Bible in high school English classes of the future and discussing it as mere literature, laughing at the notion of people actually taking the Bible literally.
 


posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply)
post date: 02.15.04 (7:47 pm)

I can't wait until the 25th Century Disney version of the New Testament



posted by: RedTigress (reply)
post date: 02.17.04 (11:30 am)

Reply to: therealspartacus007

haha, they already tried with the Torah. "The Prince of Egypt" was not only accurate, but also REALLY well done! (in case you can't tell, that was great big effin' sarcasm) ;)



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 02.18.04 (6:44 am)

Well a hundred years ago, michael faraday said that religion will die out in the next 100 years or so with the advancement of science. Did you think it did? Religion is not something you contemplate over a blog. After all, if I gave you all the evidence in the world that God exists and you agreed with them, you still won't believe in God :-). The reason people hang on to religion is because they see how it can change people's lives. For better or for worse is another story. But the fact that people are willing to put aside their scientific truths just to believe what a 2 inch think book says makes people wonder what is so great about the book. And as long as there is inequality, the group of people who are on the unfavoured side would pray to a divine being for justice. That's one of the reasons why karl marx came up with the idea of communism. Equality among everyone and absolutely NO GOD!. Look what happens to the idalogy..Communist Russia collasped. Look at China, is it progressing? People are dying by the millions there of starvation. Because without religion, people begin to lose the meaning of life. It's like why bother living? To survive? why survive? after all the next generation would have to take all this crap if there is no divine intervention to make their lives better. Work hard? Why work hard? If my government has no God that they swear an oath to, they might just take my money away with I painstakingly worked for it. I am not stating reasons to support that God exists. But reasons people are supporting the belief in God.



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 02.21.04 (2:39 am)

Here's the problem Red: you get your deep thoughts from watching the Simpsons.

You obviously believe in moral relativism, but you fail to see that it is itself a faith, a myth, and a passing of judgment. And oh yes, you also clearly believe it is superior to all other beliefs (that's why you laugh at those who take the Bible seriously; that's why you disdain organized religion).

I call that arrogance.



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 02.21.04 (2:41 am)

Here's the problem Dragon: you get your deep thoughts from watching the Simpsons.

You obviously believe in moral relativism, but you fail to see that it is itself a faith, a myth, and a passing of judgment. And oh yes, you also clearly believe it is superior to all other beliefs (that's why you laugh at those who take the Bible seriously; that's why you disdain organized religion).

I call that arrogance.

(APOLOGIES TO REDTIGRESS FOR GETTING HER NAME MIXED UP)



posted by: DragonBait22 (reply)
post date: 02.21.04 (9:09 pm)

Reply to: newbie
You're right, every thought I've ever had or any idea was from the Simpsons.

I thought I made it clear before that morals are absolute for the individual but must be considered in relation to the morals of other individuals, as not everyone holds the same moral standards. If you disagree with that, I'd like to hear an explanation.

I don't think moral relativism is superior to other beliefs and I fail to see how my views on the relativity of morality can even be called a faith, or a myth (what?). The primary function of acknowledging that morality is relative is to allow for judgment. We consider our own moral standards in regard to the standards of others, then we can decide which is better.

Yes, I believe my views on just about everything are better than other views. That's why I have those views- I've compared them to others and decided which I felt to be better. While I'll readily admit that I hold my views as being superior to yours or anyone else's (unless they share mine ;) ), I am willing to examine another's viewpoint and consider the possibility that they're views are better than my own.

I guess I am arrogant, though you're the only person to ever call me that. Thanks, James.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
"Tragically, a nation that was created by intellectuals and visionaries has now been completely taken over by venal corporate gangsters, delusional Christian fruitcakes and hopelessly shallow Texas shit-kickers." -Tom Robbins